AI 2040: Plan A
ai-2040.com · 1,491 words · saved by 1 readers
A detailed forecast and recommendation for how the US, China and the rest of the world should navigate superintelligence.
Q: Isn’t Plan A bad for concentration of power risks? A: No, Plan A reduces COP risks by a lot. The status quo involves an insane amount of power concentrating into the frontier AI companies (which are all based in the US). If they solve the alignment problem, the result will be a handful of AI CEOs or USG officials controlling an army of superintelligences, and hence having the ability to take over the world. (This is what happened in the slowdown ending of AI 2027). Plan A dramatically improves on the status quo by: Increasing the number and diversity of frontier AI companies. Because…
saved by
related reading
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- The Moonshot - by Anton Leicht - Threading the Needlewriting.antonleicht.me
- Introducing Plan A - by Scott Alexander - Astral Codex Tenastralcodexten.com
- AI 2040: Plan A — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- AI 2027ai-2027.com
- Selective Optimism: a critique of AI 2040 - by Richard Ngomindthefuture.info
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- Plans A, B, C, and D for misalignment risk — LessWronglesswrong.com