Contesting AI Safety | TechPolicy.Press
techpolicy.press · 1,480 words · saved by 1 readers
Victor Zhenyi Wang discusses how an existential risk frame for AI safety distracts us from addressing the more immediate harms caused by AI systems.
Contesting AI Safety | TechPolicy.Press Contesting AI Safety Victor Zhenyi Wang / Sep 12, 2024 EU President Ursula von der Leyen, US Vice President Kamala Harris, and Fmr. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at the AI Safety Summit hosted by the UK government in November 2023. ( Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street ) Republish Share Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, AI policy and regulation have increasingly focused on safety. With California set to pass the first comprehensive legislation around AI safety, a natural question might be: what do policymakers mean when they talk about saf
related reading
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- In search of a dynamist vision for safe superhuman AIhelentoner.substack.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- AI Safety for Fleshy Humans: a whirlwind touraisafety.dance
- Reframing AI Safety as a Neverending Institutional Challenge – Stephen Casperstephencasper.com
- Xi-Trump to talk AI Safety, Huh?chinatalk.media
- A guide to the AI tribes - by Michel Justen - What is thismicheljusten.substack.com
- Existential risk from artificial intelligence - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Existential Risk from AI: An Exposition for Mathematiciansalkjash.github.io
- AGI safety from first principles: Introduction — LessWronglesswrong.com