One Argument Against An Army — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 3,999 words · saved by 1 readers
I talked about a style of reasoning in which not a single contrary argument is allowed, with the result that every non-supporting observation has to…
x One Argument Against An Army — LessWrong Against Rationalization Motivated Reasoning Rationalization Frontpage 127 One Argument Against An Army by Eliezer Yudkowsky 15th Aug 2007 2 min read 37 127 I talked about a style of reasoning in which not a single contrary argument is allowed, with the result that every non-supporting observation has to be argued away. Here I suggest that when people encounter a contrary argument, they prevent themselves from downshifting their confidence by rehearsing already-known support. Suppose the country of Freedonia is debating whether its neighbor, Sylvania,
related reading
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [REPOST] Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- checklist_of_rationality_habits.pdfrationality.org
- Local Validity as a Key to Sanity and Civilization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationality Checklistrationality.org
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Leave a Line of Retreat — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Ask "Why Do You Believe That?" not "Do You Have Any Evidence?"substack.com
- How To Write Quickly While Maintaining Epistemic Rigor — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What is Evidence? — LessWronglesswrong.com