Theories of Change for AI Auditing
apolloresearch.ai · 5,425 words · saved by 1 readers
Apollo Research's framework for how AI auditing reduces risk from misaligned AI.
Executive Summary Our mission at Apollo Research is to reduce catastrophic risks from AI by auditing advanced AI systems for misalignment and dangerous capabilities, with an initial focus on deceptive alignment. In our announcement post, we presented a brief theory of change of our organization which explains why we expect AI auditing to be strongly positive for reducing catastrophic risk from advanced AI systems. In this post, we present a theory of change for how AI auditing could improve the safety of advanced AI systems. We describe what AI auditing organizations would do; why we…
saved by
related reading
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Auditing language models for hidden objectives \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work on — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2408.02565] Reasons to Doubt the Impact of AI Risk Evaluationsarxiv.org
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work onthirdthing.ai
- What we’d like to fund — Paradigm 3paradigm3.org
- Auditing failures vs concentrated failures — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Auditing language models for hidden objectives — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Auditing the singularitywuthejeff.com
- A Summary of Recent Work (July 2026)gdmalignment.substack.com