Why products should be “slick”, not just viable | ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ Herman's blog
I hate the term MVP. Over the past decade, it’s been overused and misunderstood to the point where something labeled as an MVP is automatically assumed to be pr
Why products should be “slick”, not just viable – Herman's blog Why products should be “slick”, not just viable 02 Nov, 2020 I hate the term MVP. Over the past decade, it’s been overused and misunderstood to the point where something labeled as an MVP is automatically assumed to be pretty shit. Most MVPs are unfortunately too M to be V, and the culture of “ship it while you’re embarrassed by it” tends to lead to products providing users with an embarrassingly bad experience. The problem is that your users hate MVPs. Building products is a difficult and time-consuming effort. Figuring out what
related reading
- How to plan an MVP : YC Startup Library | Y Combinatorycombinator.com
- Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linearlinear.app
- Making sense of MVP (Minimum Viable Product) - and why I prefer Earliest Testable/Usable/Lovable - Crisp's Blogblog.crisp.se
- We Don’t Sell Saddles Here. The memo below was sent to the team at… | by Stewart Butterfield | Mediummedium.com
- Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linearlinear.app
- Steve Blank An MVP is not a Cheaper Product, It’s about Smart Learningsteveblank.com
- My Philosophy of Product Building (Part II)every.to
- How Superhuman Built an Engine to Find Product Market Fitreview.firstround.com
- Get Your Reps: product, design, and engineering lessons from building Sail & Muddy - Alejandro García Salasalejandro.pe
- How to build great products | defmacrodefmacro.org
- Paul Buchheit: The most important thing to understand about new products and startupspaulbuchheit.blogspot.com
- The simplest (and best) way to know if a problem is realhowtheygrow.co