AI bias and AI safety teams are divided on artificial intelligence - Vox
vox.com · 1,613 words · saved by 1 readers
AI poses present risks and future ones. Why don’t the teams that work on them get along?
Future Perfect There are two factions working to prevent AI dangers. Here’s why they’re deeply divided. AI poses present risks and future ones. Why don’t the teams that work on them get along? by Kelsey Piper Aug 10, 2022, 11:30 AM UTC Artificial intelligence systems are getting more and more impressive. The people who work on ensuring they have good effects are beset by internal squabbling. Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Kelsey Piper is a contributing editor at Future Perfect, Vox’s effective altruism-inspired section on the world’s biggest challenges. She explores wide-ranging topics
related reading
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- A guide to the AI tribes - by Michel Justen - What is thismicheljusten.substack.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Leaving Open Philanthropy, going to Anthropic - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- I Would Have Solved Alignment, But I Was Worried That Would Advance Timelines — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- A Field Guide to AI Safety—Asteriskasteriskmag.com