Why Programmers Should(n't) Learn Theory | Path-Sensitive
pathsensitive.com · 4,221 words · saved by 1 readers
I’m currently taking my 5-person advanced coaching group on a month-long study of objects. It turns out that, even though things called “ob...
Why Programmers Should(n't) Learn Theory | Path-Sensitive --> Monday, March 15, 2021 Why Programmers Should(n't) Learn Theory technical March 15, 2021 I’m currently taking my 5-person advanced coaching group on a month-long study of objects. It turns out that, even though things called “objects” are ubiquitous in modern programming languages, true objects are quite different from the popular understanding, and it requires quite a bit of theory to understand how to recognize true objects and when they are useful. As our lessons take this theoretical turn, one asks me “wh
related reading
- how I think when I think about programming - alice mazalicemaz.com
- Essays on programming I think about a lot | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- Things unlearnedscattered-thoughts.net
- In defense of blub studies | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- Thoughts on the software industry | linus.coffeelinus.coffee
- What every computer science major should knowmatt.might.net
- What to learndanluu.com
- Type theory - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Learnable Programmingworrydream.com
- MIT 6.512, Fall 2025frap.csail.mit.edu
- Introductionthird-bit.com
- Jane Street Blog - Formal methods and the future of programmingblog.janestreet.com