Technology is not inevitable - by Max Langenkamp
maxlangenkamp.substack.com · 1,010 words · saved by 1 readers
friends don't let friends get absorbed by totalizing ideologies
When talking to certain technologist friends about brain-computer interfaces and artificial general intelligence, I’m struck by how often I hear that such idea-complexes1 are referred to as ‘inevitable’. In this example, my friend (who I’ll use to represent the various people2 who’ve held this stance) basically says: ‘if it is physically possible, and there is economic incentive, it’ll happen’. Let’s put aside the initial question about the ambiguity of what counts as BCI/AGI. I’m going to argue that claims about technological inevitability are wrong and monopolistic. When I say ‘BCI is…
related reading
- maxlangenkamp.me/posts/tech_not_inevitable/maxlangenkamp.me
- The future of AI is already written | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Dario Amodei — Machines of Loving Gracedarioamodei.com
- My techno-optimismvitalik.eth.limo
- Dario Amodei — Machines of Loving Gracedarioamodei.com
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- Technocalvinism - by Cosmos Institute and Luke Dragoblog.cosmos-institute.org
- On Inevitabilityborretti.me
- Intelligence is not the main bottleneck - by Ruxandra Teslowritingruxandrabio.com
- Dario Amodei — Machines of Loving Gracedarioamodei.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- The Neurotechnology Age. Brain-computer interfaces exist today… | by Matt Angle | Mediummedium.com