Do AI as science and engineering instead | Better without AI
We’ve seen that current AI practice leads to technologies that are expensive, difficult to apply in real-world situations, and inherently unsafe. Neglected scientific and engineering investigations can bring better understanding of the risks of current AI technology, and can lead to safer technologies. AI is unavoidably hybrid as an intellectual discipline. It incorporates aspects of six others: science, engineering, mathematics, philosophy, design, and spectacle. Each of these contributes valuable ways of understanding, and their synergies power AI insights. Different schools of thought within AI emphasize some disciplines and deemphasize others, which contribute to their different strengths and weaknesses. The current backprop-based mainstream overemphasizes spectacle (the creation of impressive demo systems) and mathematics (function optimization methods). It neglects science (understanding how and why the networks work) and engineering (building reliable, efficient solutions to spe
We’ve seen that current AI practice leads to technologies that are expensive, difficult to apply in real-world situations, and inherently unsafe. Neglected scientific and engineering investigations can bring better understanding of the risks of current AI technology, and can lead to safer technologies. AI is unavoidably hybrid as an intellectual discipline. It incorporates aspects of six others: science, engineering, mathematics, philosophy, design, and spectacle. Each of these contributes valuable ways of understanding, and their synergies power AI insights. Different schools of thought withi
related reading
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI Safety for Fleshy Humans: a whirlwind touraisafety.dance
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Safety as a Scientific Pursuit - by Tom McGrathbanburismus.substack.com
- 2023 letter | Zhengdongzhengdongwang.com
- Sporadicamichaelnotebook.com
- How should we evaluate progress in AI? | Better without AIbetterwithout.ai
- Assessing skeptical views of interpretability research | Christopher Pottsweb.stanford.edu
- Danger, AI Scientist, Danger - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Import AI 431: Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fearimportai.substack.com